Minnesota Classic Glastron Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 06:23:46 AM

Title: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 06:23:46 AM
Since I'm going to try and document my restoration of the "72" CV16 I bought I figured it would be better to start a thread here rather than use my Intro or Wanted threads.  Recently bought this 1972 Glastron Carlson CV-16, it's titled in FL as a 1972 but looking at the ID number it seems to be a 1973 model.  It's got a 1988 Johnson 120 VRO on the back and looks like it's had some work done previously but was then neglected a bit.  I plan to replace the floor and either sand/buff the gel coat or sand/re-paint the boat.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 06:26:34 AM
More Pictures where I started ripping out the floor where it was soft.  Turns out it was rotted.  The top of the floor looked great but once I ripped off that top piece of fiberglass the wood was soft and wet.  Also looks like the transom has been replaced before.  Looks like an OK job, I need to beef up the corners as I can see light come through the fiberglass from it being rather thin.

I do have a question though, in the 2nd picture what do I do with those areas where the white arrows are pointing?  Do i just rip out the wood and foam and leave it or do I need to get some other type of foam, or do I just leave the foam and replace the wood?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Plugcheck on October 18, 2018, 07:50:57 AM
Those are the flotation boxes, their required use is long been debated.  Some keep them, some folks remove them.  The decision is yours.  I would check them by using a long 3/8" drill bit.  Drill into the foam at the bottom of the space, parrallel to the hull bottom.  If the foam is wet, tear out the boxes.   The old foam, once saturated, will both be heavy and unable to provide critical flotation.   If you opt to replace them, the correct 2lb foam is fairly easy to work.  Some have used the dense construction foam sheets with good results.  I prefer the pour foam because it fills all the voids, deadens sound, and really sticks to stuff well.  You can also make the boxes from fiberglass panels as well if you like, then you have no more wood rot anxiety.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 07:59:40 AM
Those are the flotation boxes, their required use is long been debated.  Some keep them, some folks remove them.  The decision is yours.  I would check them by using a long 3/8" drill bit.  Drill into the foam at the bottom of the space, parrallel to the hull bottom.  If the foam is wet, tear out the boxes.   The old foam, once saturated, will both be heavy and unable to provide critical flotation.   If you opt to replace them, the correct 2lb foam is fairly easy to work.  Some have used the dense construction foam sheets with good results.  I prefer the pour foam because it fills all the voids, deadens sound, and really sticks to stuff well.  You can also make the boxes from fiberglass panels as well if you like, then you have no more wood rot anxiety.

Ah, alright.  I'll have to do some research on it.  I've seen it being removed from some of the floor replacement posts on here but wasn't sure if it was the same thing or not. 

a few more questions I thought of:
1- What wood/composite does everyone recommend? I've seen marine grade wood, composite from Express composites and then just regular treated plywood used so is it just price and peace of mind that makes the difference?
2- What fibergalss/resin should I use and where is the best place to buy it?  I do have a West Marine relatively close to me but if I can find something online cheaper then I'd rather do that.
3- Should I paint/coat the transom/bilge area with anything?  Right now it just looks like bare fiberglass and I didn't know if it was beneficial to paint or coat with something.

Thanks guys!

Bill
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 10:08:54 AM
Glastron added the large foam boxes in the rear for level floatation.

I didn't replace mind for a few reasons, wanted more room for storage, I always boat with other people so some one would be close by to help and I do 99% of my boating on rivers, where shore is close by.
Plus .. My boat is insured for more then it's worth … LOL
 If I were to do most of my boating on large lakes by myself I would have added the extra foam. I don't think with my 18 gal. fuel tank in the bow and the other foam in my boat that it would sink, but would sit nose up with motor under water.

The foam in my boxes was dry but transom wood on left side behind box (picture tr1) was so rotted I could remove it with my fingers.
Your bilge bowl is square so they changed the design of stringers in that area. Should look like (picture tr2).

Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 10:24:18 AM
yes they did re-design it and honestly from feeling around in it there is no hole/access port for water under the floor to come out, it's completely closed in which I found odd.  I still have to remove the floor back there but i'm thinking I'll have to re-design it again. 

So there's not any huge lakes near me so I doubt I'll be on anything large, and I don't think i'll be taking this on the Gulf so I don't know if I really need the foam then.  Gregg, what's yours look like now in the back if you don't have the boxes?

What about the foam under the floor, is that necessary or no?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 10:32:54 AM
Having transom replaced is good and bad …
Good because it's done … Bad because you don't know how well it was done.

The deck had to be removed in order to do it, and on older models deck was riveted on, so it wasn't an easy job.
Was told that early versions didn't have the wood strip running around edge of hull, mine has a wood strip and is screwed together (picture ff10 red arrow).
Do you plan on removing deck ? 

I did make a box on right side by battery to hide/store cables and wires, but panel is screwed on so I can remove it.
I haven't painted stern yet but will some day with gel coat ..
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 10:41:35 AM
From what I can see right now I don't think i need to remove the deck BUT I haven't ripped out enough to be 100% on that.  I hope I don't need to remove it.  I know that the rear rub rail is riveted on but they look new so I assume that the deck was removed.  I think I might just do a box like you did next to the battery.

Is Gel coat the best option for the stern/transom area?

I need to finish ripping out the floor and other rotted stuff before I figure out if I'll need to split the boat or not.  I'm hoping that I just need to replace the floor/stringers and then the floor running across the back of the dash.

O and my boat does NOT have wood running the length of the hull.  It actually looks fiberglassed together to me when I look but it was hot, dark, and I was itchy when I looked so i didn't take a good look.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 10:48:58 AM
I didn't replace foam logs in my floor, but made small notches in stringers to drain water from hull.
Notches are much smaller then the ones in picture. It's just to show you what was done.

With almost everything on your boat .. There is no (within reason) right or wrong with how and why you do stuff.
What works for me might not for you.
Do some reading and post your thoughts, some one could respond with ideas that enforce or shot your idea down.
Like it or not .. You are now a marine designer … LOL

I did crack my hull .. You might want to add some fiberglass to hull or do some extra stringers.
CV leaker …
http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=7823.0 (http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=7823.0)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 11:04:11 AM
" It actually looks fiberglassed together to me when I look but it was hot, dark, and I was itchy when I looked so i didn't take a good look."

Yep .. riveted on outside and glassed on inside.
If transom is OK, no need to remove deck.

My under splash well / transom was painted when new, gel would seal better then paint.
Or just leave it bare. Water never sits in my boat long enough to absorb into glass.

The side boards that are forward facing are tabbed to bottom/hull and up the side a little, they are up off floor a little to allow carpet to tuck under them for a clean look. They are not attached to deck on top. I screwed mine to deck while I tabbed them to hull and forgot to remove screws from top of board / deck. Got back after first time out and screws had snapped off .. Think deck moves around some. 
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 11:38:57 AM
AAAHHH … The wood / resin question … LOL

Shawn posted this for me … VERY GOOD READ !

Here is a good article on fiberglass and repairs.
https://www.fibreglast.com/product/fiberglass-repair-composite-repair/Learning_Center (https://www.fibreglast.com/product/fiberglass-repair-composite-repair/Learning_Center)
Here is a link to a lot of fiberglass information. Even info on using metal flake.
https://www.fibreglast.com/category/Learning_Center (https://www.fibreglast.com/category/Learning_Center)

If done right, even exterior ply, poly resin (from a fiberglass supply company and mixed to proper ratios) will last 30 to 40 years.
Fixing some of the design flaws will help (hull drainage) sealing all wood (if used) mixing resin to proper ratios (measuring cups and syringes) and good glass will out last you.
Your motor is within ratings for the hull, so you shouldn't need any major design upgrades.

Doug's buddy's built some crazy cool boats, but there mounting 150 to 200 HP motors on the stern.
 C500 Spy Pics …
http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=7551.0 (http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=7551.0)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 01:02:50 PM
Yea my boat(s) won't sit in water more than the few hours I'm in the water.  Even if I did live on the water I'd have them on a lift. 

I'll take a look at those links, I've seen posts about all the different options but have read so much i'm now confused lol.  As I stated in my other thread, I don't necessarily need a boat that looks brand new but I want it done right so that I don't have to do it again for a long while, hopefully it'll last until my kids are my age and they can do it haha.

I was going to sell the motor but the more I think about it I think I'll stick with it, it just needs a cleaning and some TLC with some hoses and such.  I'm going to try and finish getting the floor up this weekend but we'll see how that goes, I'm still helping people clean up from the hurricane (we didn't get hit as bad as Panama City but not everyone can cut up trees and move the stuff that did fall in their yards.

Thanks again for the links and help Gregg.  i wish I lived closer to y'all to be able to attend the meets and get help from fellow G/C owners.  Doesn't seem to be a big following for classic boats anywhere near me.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 03:00:45 PM
Ya .. I would keep that motor !
Price of the package brought the value of the motor down ! 
Is compression OK ?  Gear case (shifts gears) OK ?  Did it run ?
Set up right .. You'll have a 55 MPH/GPS boat with that motor !

After cracking my hull, my floor is also removed. My stringer is wrapped well, without any rot, so no need to replace.
Not sure how or why my hull cracked, but Ed had his hull done with braces (not sure of exact term, picture 05).
Ray is going with a core, which is strong and light, but a lot of work.
I'm not sure yet if I'll just lay some 1808 glass down or lay glass and some sort of short stringers (running same as stringer) on ether side to support hull in that area ..

After reading about composite flooring, and that you would have to glass both sides, plus would have to put supports under seat base's I think I'm going with ply, maybe marine if I think far enough ahead to order it from home supply store .. LOL
I'll be useing vinylester resin, because it a little more price wise then polyester, but is a newer stronger version of poly. Maybe ...

I'm not adding foam under floor, mostly because of product added price, and less because of it's down sides ..
Maybe if I had added foam to my hull it wouldn't have cracked ?

BUT .. Don't get your resin from home supply store .. Get it from a fiberglass supply company. Mix to there exact ratio ! Get measuring cups and syringes to get it right !  If you don't get it right it will kick to soon and heat up, or it might never cure ..  Picture "Hotbatch" is some Bondo brand resin thinned down that got a little hot !
Plan a head before you start glassing. Cut and fit all fiberglass before mixing. Get lot of rubber gloves, cheap paint brushes and small rollers. Have someone mixing resin while you lay it out.

Thay slapped your boat together as fast as possable from the factory .. Your going to do a much better build then they did ..

Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Plugcheck on October 18, 2018, 08:15:30 PM
Doug can't be too far away from you, and Florida has a lot of marine stores and supplies. 
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 08:29:58 PM
Doug would also be your guy for J/E info …
What year is your Johnson ?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 18, 2018, 08:37:30 PM
It's a 1988 according to the model number. I've got a west marine near me but I don't know how their products are.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 18, 2018, 09:21:25 PM
I sent you a PM.
Some marine mech. on the forum and other members have had bad luck with Sierra aftermarket parts.
Would be best to go with OMC / BRP parts.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 22, 2018, 07:50:54 AM
So i got some more work done.  Removed the gauges and wiring and de-rigged the engine so I can remove it.  Also ripped out a good bit of the floor to assess damage and although the floor didn't feel soft except in that one spot the entire thing was wet, and it's because the bottom of the wood that was used was not glassed in so it was just bare wood.

Also when removing the gauges I removed the plate that has the serial number on it and it seems odd.  As you can see the piece with the serial number on it looks like it was cut from another piece of plate.  Looks suspicious, is this how Glastron did it or did someone make this?  Is there anywhere else on the boat that the serial number could be checked?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Oldfishguy on October 22, 2018, 08:44:30 AM
Go to the back of the boat and the serial number will be stamped into the hull; the last two digits should give you the year the hull was made. What does it say?

My 1972 hull and 1973 interior and gel color.  I suspect a left over hull made in 1972 that made it to the 1973 production line somehow.  I'm sure they didn't want to waste a hull.

http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=5298.0 (http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=5298.0)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: 75starflight on October 22, 2018, 08:57:32 AM
I have seen this before. the 1973 V179 I stripped down had the same thing for a serial number on the instrument panel.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 22, 2018, 08:59:20 AM
Go to the back of the boat and the serial number will be stamped into the hull; the last two digits should give you the year the hull was made. What does it say?
http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=5298.0 (http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=5298.0)

There's nothing on the back that I can see.  The transom was replaced so maybe whoever did that work covered it up, or I could be missing it, is it port or starboard side?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 10:19:16 AM
That is very interesting .. The piece with your number is a data plate.
It didn't match up with a plate from a 1972 G/C CV21 plate, but could be from a Glastron ?
Maybe … I don't have any Glastron plates saved, so not sure.

First picture is a 1971 CV16 data plate.
Second picture is a 1972 CV21 that I clipped picture (4-21dp2)
Third picture is your number.
Forth is clipped 72 CV21 data plate, didn't line up right
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 10:32:01 AM
First picture is a 1972 CV16 data plate .. Looks like it was a separate piece. I would think your is original.
Was it just set in there, glued ?  Taped ?  Can you take a picture of back side ?

Dave (1972 CV16) and Jason (1974 CV16SS) found tags glassed in around the piece of wood behind dash.
Look around to see if you might have one, think they said it was near side of hull tabbing.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 10:35:19 AM
You could see SN right side just below rub rail.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 10:52:06 AM
When they replaced floor they must have added the extra short side stringers.
Pretty sure G/C never did three stringers.
Was floor done well, tabbed in, covered with glass ? Do you think they did a good job, aside from not sealing bottom of wood ?
Are stringers still solid ?
Second picture is my hull, which has a crack along right side chine.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 22, 2018, 11:34:00 AM
There's no number on the starboard side of my transom.  Could be that whoever repaired transom glassed over or something like that.  I will have to get under the dash to look for the tag under there.

Honestly the stringers are in great condition.  They are solid throughout and i didn't find a single section that was soft so it looks like they were done well.  I need to still tear a little bit out of the front and back floor where the main stringer is but the part i can see/feel was dry so we'll see what it looks like when I'm done removing the rest of the floow.  Outside of the bottom of the floor not being glassed over the rest of it was done well, definitely not the persons first attempt at fiberglass.

Also the SN piece was glued to the back originally but once I took the plate off the glue didn't hold very long so it looked original but I just didn't know.  Seemed odd to me. 

Another thing, I think the boat was originally an orange.  The current red is obviously a roll on job over the blue, which had no flake in it and in some places the blue is peeling off and showing a copper/orange/gold color.  I think I am going to end up doing a lot of sanding to get all the coats off.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 12:33:54 PM
So the original color is apricot ?  Maybe the two coats of paint are filling letters and numbers of SN ?
Hope they didn't fill in SN because something "fishy" was going on …

Sometimes people paint boats because they don't like the color, others think because gel / flake is cloudy and dull it shot.  Your flake might still be OK. Being painted would keep it from fading any more then it was before being painted.
Remove old paint on deck and see how bad it is. You could get lucky and it just needs some wet sanding /compound and it'll shine like new. Some have used paint remover, brush it on, wait awhile, scrap it off with plastic scraper. Hope some one comments on which brand to use.

That a good sign that floor was done well. so maybe the transom was also well done.

I know you wanted blue, but apricot is a very cool color, my favorite .. Check out Dave's (Oldfishguy) CV pictures ..
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 22, 2018, 12:43:35 PM
yea it very well could have been filled in by paint but I looked over it pretty well and didn't see any indentations.  I think it may be apricot but part of the white in your pictures is peeling and that also has the gold/orange color so I have no idea what the true color was.  I'm going to work on sanding the deck after I get the floor removed to see it's condition and to see if I can save the original gel or not, that's obviously cheaper but i'll assess it after some sanding.

I'm hoping the transom was done well, it looks pretty good, although there's a weird plug looking thing next to the drain plug, i'll take a picture and see if you guys know what it is, it doesn't go all the way through the transom but it's near the drain hole on the port side.

I actually don't mind any color, my wife wants orange after seeing fireman's cv-23 that he restored.  I like the way it looks on a boat (even if I'm a Florida State fan and all of our rivals have orange as one of their school colors lol).  I just want it to stand out, so either refresh the original gel or paint it with some flake :)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 01:45:21 PM
Mine has a bow mounted fuel tank with copper line running back to splash well, wrapped around copper line is a wire that runs down to ground thingy mounted to outside of transom. Is that what your seeing ? Your doesn't have bow tank though. 
Or ..
Drain for hull, because he didn't have hole that would drain hull into bilge bowl.


Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 22, 2018, 01:50:22 PM
so it looks like that but it doesn't go through the transom.  Just looks like it's bolted to the outside of the transom.  I do have a bow mounted tank, someone must have put it in cause it's definitely not factory.  I'll try to take pictures of it later.  It's not a huge deal if I can't figure it out, I'm just a fan of not having stuff on the transom that's unnecessary. 
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 02:22:08 PM
Agreed .. My transom had wood rot from a speedo pilot tube mounts not being sealed and water got in and rotted wood down from mount hole over to drain hole. I could remove rotted wood with my fingers it was so bad, just like wood behind left side of my floatation foam box.

The 1970 and 1971 CV's had flake like pictures below .. Thin flake strip running up to bow.
1972 and later had flake running to bow and bow was flake. All were color of flake and white. Latter models might have been listed as "Sand" for the white color, but were very close to same.


The 1972 CV16 also came in gold, see quite a few CV16SS in gold but not many outboards in gold.
Ray's got a gold one ..
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 22, 2018, 02:26:01 PM
Ray's 1972 Gold CV16.
Would be very cool if yours was gold !
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 23, 2018, 06:32:27 AM
So i was mistaken, the plug does go through the transom so I'm wondering if it's like yours Gregg and is something to do with the fuel tank (see 1st and 2nd pictures).

The last 2 pictures are of what I think could be the original color(s).  You can see behind the white is a goldish color but behind the red and blue is the orange color.  Think I'll have to sand them down to truly figure it out.

Also closely inspected the transom area and there's definitely no numbers there.  Will have to remove the piece of wood a PO placed under dash for support to check if there's any tag glassed in under there.

Bill
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: rayar3 on October 23, 2018, 07:19:00 AM
The data plate on your 72 is correct. I own both a 72 and 73. My 73 doesn’t have a dash plate, but it does have a HIN on the transom and the 72 does not. Didn’t know they cut up another plate to stamp the numbers, though! Carlson ingenuity. I wonder if they also got the wood used in the hulls from the pallets of fiberglass supplies, lol!
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 23, 2018, 09:57:59 AM
Might have had a fuel tank mounted under splash well and grounded thru hull ?
Also might have been painted blue and gold at one time … YUCK !

Apricot's a cool color .. Bryon has / had a red CV with bad flake, so he tinted some clear with red and it came out pretty good.
Saved doing an entire re-paint or flake/gel.

Don't think your has HIN in stern.

Ray .. Could have been pallet wood for stringers, but where did they get the wood for transom ?   … LOL
All CV16SS would have had grounding anodes, did even early CV16's have them ?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 30, 2018, 02:56:41 PM
hey guys, was removing the windshield as part of my tear down and the nuts were rusted to the bolts so the bolts broke on one of the mounts.  I can't find these things anywhere online.  Can one of y'all help?  It's the piece the arrows pointing to in the pic
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 30, 2018, 03:55:00 PM
Mine are stainless steel studs (I'm assuming because they were not rusted) screwed into aluminum trim pieces (part you pictured).
I think ...
Did you get the old one out of trim piece ?
I'll ask Ray ...
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 30, 2018, 03:57:00 PM
hmm, maybe mine were studs too but I will check, it didn't look like it.  I've got a few more things to take off before getting to the grinding of old fiberglass to start the floor replacement.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 30, 2018, 04:06:50 PM
I know mine were SS studs.
Pretty sure original.
Ray looking at his.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 30, 2018, 04:13:05 PM
Yep you're right they are studs, just couldn't see it easily with rust and corrosion.

Tried to take a picture but I couldn't get it. Did you replace the studs or switch to bolts?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 30, 2018, 04:39:02 PM
No .. mine were in good shape, must have been stainless steel studs.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: rayar3 on October 30, 2018, 04:40:37 PM
I think mine are studs? I’ll look when I get home. Either way soaking with pb blaster and using an ez out should work. Then I’d just use bolts. If you break yours I think I have an extra set. You could always bring it to a machine shop and have them put in a helicoil, too.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 30, 2018, 05:39:15 PM
Did you / can you get the old stud out ?
I would find a SS bolt about the same length, cut head off and use some red loctite if threads are intact or JB weld stud in if threads are bad.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 30, 2018, 05:42:24 PM
I can't get it out without drilling it out. It's rusted in there and it broke right at the edge. One mount didn't break so I can probably get that one out but if I've gotta tap new threads in one i may as well do both so they're the same size.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 30, 2018, 06:10:34 PM
If the other stud is OK .. I wouldn't mess with it.
If it ain't broken .. don't fix it !
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Plugcheck on October 30, 2018, 07:18:03 PM
Could very well be standard hardware, especially considering rust.  Getting it out might be difficult, but there are plenty of options.  In most cases where I have a broken studs in aluminum, I will TIG weld a nut to the stud.  MIG works nearly as well, but makes more splatter.  Let it cool a few minutes, then turn back and forth till it loosens up.  Sometimes you have to repeat if the nut turns off.  There really is no worse case here, if ya really bugger up the hole, drill it out and use larger hardware, or weld it shut and re tap.  Just a thought, a toilet seat hardware kit(brass and plastic) would likely never be an issue.  If you really get stuck, I could help, only cost materials and mailing.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on October 30, 2018, 07:38:33 PM
I'd sent it to Mike !
LOL …
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: 84carlson on October 30, 2018, 07:45:48 PM
Do you have plans for the tow bar, I would be interested in buying the eye bolt that the bar arms click into.  They are the ones in the fiberglass in each side if the transom.

Joe
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on October 30, 2018, 07:59:40 PM
That's a good idea on welding a nut on the stud Mike. I'll have to try that.

Joe I was planning on keeping it but we'll see if that stands in a few months. I'll let you know if I decide to let it go.

Bill
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on November 19, 2018, 07:17:19 AM
Hey guys, do you know where I can find this piece in the picture?  It's the starboard corner piece of the rub rail on the transom.  When I removed it it broke in half.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Plugcheck on November 19, 2018, 07:42:59 AM
    Is it too corroded to consider welding, grinding, and polishing?    If not, hopefully you can find one.   
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on November 19, 2018, 07:46:21 AM
it actually isn't corroded at all, I just think that it was bent when a previous owner removed it cause it had a small 'tear' where one of the rivets was.  When I was pulling it off the rivet must have snagged it and it broke in half like warm butter.  Is it aluminum?  My welder doesn't weld aluminum so I'd have to find someone to weld it together if it is.  I can weld steel.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: thedeuceman on November 19, 2018, 09:28:13 AM
I purchased a pair of reproductions from Ray for the CV 16 that I sold the Shawn, it needed the the port side. So we may be able to help you out with that. Otherwise the information I got from Ray was that it’s kind a hard to work with this stuff but you have to use 356t rod.
So if you can’t find somebody there to weld it just let us kno.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on November 19, 2018, 09:55:21 AM
Thanks Joe.  I'm going to try and go by my mechanic and see if they can weld it or not, they are the only person near me that I know does welding with aluminum.  But if not I'll definitely be interested in Shawn's starboard side cause otherwise I'm gonna go with  replacing the whole strip with one of the more 'universal' ones which i don't really want to do since I have the original on it.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Plugcheck on November 19, 2018, 09:59:24 AM
     Certainly hoping you can locate one, if you do, I wouldn't mind trying to weld it just to know if it is possible.   In many cases, cast aluminum pieces cannot be welded, as soon as the torch starts, the material just crumbles.   This of course if the piece is likely to end up in scrap pile.    If it does/did weld acceptably, I'd send it back, then we would all know what is possible going forward.    Just a thought............

I wonder if it could be glued back together to sandcast a new piece?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on November 19, 2018, 11:05:24 AM
Might be same rod Joe was referring to …

Aluminum Repair
http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=2907.0 (http://forum.cgoamn.com/index.php?topic=2907.0)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: thedeuceman on November 19, 2018, 11:25:34 AM
I have never tried that so I’m not sure if that would work or not, the rod I was referring to is just a different alloy, same as most castings. Not sure about the original parts at the reproductions from Ray are cast from 356 and they have imperfections so they needed to be welded and re-sand it down


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on November 20, 2018, 07:03:01 AM
So my mechanic doesn't think it's weldable.  I also didn't notice it until taking it to him but it was already bent when I went to take it off, where the hole for the rivet is it was bulged out so even if we could weld it back it would not follow the transom.  That rivet must have been holding it down pretty tight. 

You guys know if Shawn has that extra starboard one, or anywhere else I could find it.  I tried eBay with no luck.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on November 20, 2018, 10:02:58 AM
Offer this guy a crazy price for his stern trim pieces.

project # 842 .. 1973 glastron CV-16 - $175 (lhc)
https://mohave.craigslist.org/boa/d/projectglastron-cv-16/6744712772.html (https://mohave.craigslist.org/boa/d/projectglastron-cv-16/6744712772.html)

Check …

American Runabouts
https://www.facebook.com/bootrestauration/?hc_ref=ARREuWvgcp6L5-2Yg81f6fe9u6E8rwTRgwPSPfOF66XCPWJMJ2bnaR2gCjevXiQWBfo&fref=nf (https://www.facebook.com/bootrestauration/?hc_ref=ARREuWvgcp6L5-2Yg81f6fe9u6E8rwTRgwPSPfOF66XCPWJMJ2bnaR2gCjevXiQWBfo&fref=nf)

There eBay store ...
http://www.ebay.com/usr/american_runabouts?_trksid=p2047675.l2559 (http://www.ebay.com/usr/american_runabouts?_trksid=p2047675.l2559)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: thedeuceman on November 20, 2018, 11:32:24 AM
Or rayar3 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on November 20, 2018, 11:36:44 AM
He has more ?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: thedeuceman on November 20, 2018, 12:32:08 PM
I just assumed he did, maybe not


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on November 20, 2018, 02:50:07 PM
I'll message him ..
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: rayar3 on November 20, 2018, 08:19:28 PM
I might have an extra set, I’ll have to look. They can be welded using 356. My cousin doesn’t like weldig them, but I’m older! All the CV corners I’ve sold are originals that have been repaired, I’ve never reproduced any. The parts I reproduced were in 535 Almag (marine aluminum alloy). But unless you live on the ocean, these original parts are fine with a polish and wax.

I’m just about to head out flying for a while, but I’ll check and see what I have. In the middle of completely rebuilding a CVX-17 bowcap that came to me in 4 pieces so I have to check on how that’s coming at the shop, too. The 17/metric bowcap was different than the other CVX caps so a repair was a must.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: thedeuceman on November 20, 2018, 10:42:21 PM
Oops my bad “blush”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 17, 2019, 06:52:31 PM
So I've finally got the boat together enough that I can use it. Went to test it and no spark

Will be looking into it. Hopefully it's an easy fix.

I've still got to put the windshield on and hook up the fuel gauge and bilge pump.

What you guys think? (https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190617/8b3e1f52b0f628c42d83d85e5d11b90b.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190617/b025ea4cbcc1de602f82f748278375e3.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190617/70f14ba7a40b350ae39e5ec024dc59ad.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190617/5120eae8d186c8a2e3fa584b0d0ccc3c.jpg)
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: dorelse on June 17, 2019, 07:58:55 PM
Keep after it, sometimes it can take a little troubleshooting to get all the kinks worked out!
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on June 17, 2019, 08:04:22 PM
Looks Great !
Ya forgot the swoosh .. LOL
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Jason on June 18, 2019, 12:23:45 PM
Should be a fun little boat! Enjoy it.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 24, 2020, 11:08:16 AM
So had to take a break from the boat while I built my house but I got that done in march and got the boat looked at by a mechanic since I had no time.  They claimed it just needed new carb gaskets but I took it out last Friday and the motor still leaked fuel after about 2-3 minutes of running.  I felt like it had to be a small crack or tear in the lines so I replaced all the fuel lines from fuel pump to carbs in the hopes that it was one of those lines as there were some sketchy looking areas on them. 

I'm going to clean the fuel residue today and try to run the engine for a few minutes to see if it's still leaking but I did have 2 questions.  1) is it ok to run the engine on the hose for 10-15 minutes to get it warm?  I have the 'earmuffs' but didn't know if those were good for longer than a few minutes.  2) can i leave the carb cover off while running it so I can get a better look at what could be leaking if there's still a leak?

Thanks!  Hoping this is it for the engine.  Only thing after this is to replace the fuel sender and the boat will be 100% functional finally!
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on June 24, 2020, 11:33:51 AM
I think some years of J / E had plastic carb float bowls. Maybe there leaking ?
I've run mine on hose / muff's for more then ten min.
I think you just don't want to rev motor or hold it at higher throttle settings on hose.

Are you referring to air intake / baffle box mounted to carbs ?
If so you should be OK .. again just don't rev motor or hold at high rpm's.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 24, 2020, 01:23:43 PM
they might be plastic.  I'll look at them and see but i've replaced gaskets on them twice, does the plastic warp or crack?  If they are bad can i get metal ones/new plastic ones or would I need all new carbs?

I will leave it at lower RPM's just need it to run and see if it leaks after a few minutes.  Yes I am referring to the baffle box.  I'm used to older motorcycles where taking the airbox off causes lean issues and I definitely don't want that!

I'll give it a shot. 
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on June 24, 2020, 02:38:06 PM
I don't know any of the details about plastic bowls, but have heard of people replacing them, because of problems.
Yep .. Ya get a lean condition with out box. But just idling on hose for a few min. shouldn't hurt. 
There's a good old 3 / V4 cylinder OMC Facebook group that could answer all your questions.

OMC 3cyl and v4 engines ..
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1545817415730476/
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 24, 2020, 02:53:21 PM
i'm one of the few people without a FB :) I'll give it a look and see.

I also at some point need to replace the prop, it's an old aluminum and is pretty beat up.  I'm not looking for absolute top speed but something that will be good for tubing/wakeboard/slalom and just cruising.  Any suggestions?
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on June 24, 2020, 03:11:53 PM
I think Dave's running a 22P Raker prop on his CVX16 / 115 HP Johnson.
Maybe less pitch if pulling ski / tubes.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: David CVX-16 on June 24, 2020, 09:49:27 PM
If you want hole shot, do not get a Raker. One of my Rakers was purchased from someone who had difficulty getting up on plane. Rakers are for speed - high rake and little blade area.  Look into what OMC has available for general all around use - Viper, SST, etc. 
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 25, 2020, 06:49:40 AM
If you want hole shot, do not get a Raker. One of my Rakers was purchased from someone who had difficulty getting up on plane. Rakers are for speed - high rake and little blade area.  Look into what OMC has available for general all around use - Viper, SST, etc.

Thanks David.  I'll take a look at them.  I like fast but I just know my family and the way I use the boat, hole shot is more important than all out speed.  Maybe once my boys are older I can go all out  ;D
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 29, 2020, 09:59:40 AM
I don't know any of the details about plastic bowls, but have heard of people replacing them, because of problems.
Yep .. Ya get a lean condition with out box. But just idling on hose for a few min. shouldn't hurt. 
There's a good old 3 / V4 cylinder OMC Facebook group that could answer all your questions.

OMC 3cyl and v4 engines ..
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1545817415730476/

So the 'fix' for the warped plastic bowls is to sand them smooth.  So i took the bowls off, grabbed some 800 grit sand paper, some water, and my spark plug gap tool and proceeded to check the bowls.  When i started with them i could easily slide the .004" metal between my glass table and the carb bowl in multiple areas.  After sanding for a few minutes I no longer could do so.  I then put the bowls back on and started it up and nothing leaked!  However, I took the boat out after church yesterday and it ran pretty good for a while but had some hesitation in the mid-range RPM's until about 4k or so then it flew.  Went to put the boat on the trailer and tilted the motor up and....leaking, again.  After everything I'm seriously considering selling this motor and getting a different one.  There are 2 90hp's that look decent in pictures (still have to see them in person) but I feel that might not be enough HP.  What are the thoughts on that?  Ideally I'd love to have a 115 or more but beggars can't be choosers  ;D
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: 74 Carlson the II on June 29, 2020, 10:21:41 AM
Almost all carbed outboards will leak gas when you tilt them up. Take a carb that is not on the motor, fill it with fuel and tilt it in the same direction as tilting the motor up for trailering and it will leak.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: wpstarling on June 29, 2020, 10:26:28 AM
Almost all carbed outboards will leak gas when you tilt them up. Take a carb that is not on the motor, fill it with fuel and tilt it in the same direction as tilting the motor up for trailering and it will leak.

Yes i agree with that, but the amount that leaks is what concerns me.  I'm not talking a little bit.  It's enough that the shaft of the motor, which is white, is now greenish/grey.  The whole thing.  Just seems like it's leaking more than it should be, not to mention the mess it makes!

I honestly didn't check before tilting it if it was leaking so some of that fuel could have been there before i tilted it.  i just didn't notice it until tilting since it started pouring out on my boat and then the shaft/mid-section once I tilted back down.  Going all out the motor was fine but leaking fuel already caught fire once and i really don't want that with my family on the boat in the middle of a lake or river.
Title: Re: My "72" CV16 Restoration
Post by: Hyperacme on June 29, 2020, 01:24:07 PM
When I tilt my Mariner up to load at ramp, carb leak a fairly large amount of fuel out.  I cut up 3M oil absorbent pads and stuff them under air box. It keep the fuel/oil mix from running down leg.

I would run motor a few times on muff, a few hot / cold cycles to see if that causes carb bowls to leak.

Around 1984 OMC started rating HP at the prop, before that they rated at power head.
So 130 / 140 HP motors became 115 HP and 115 HP became 90 HP.
Both Merc & OMC did this around the mid 80's.