Minnesota Classic Glastron Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: rbay on February 27, 2023, 12:33:16 PM

Title: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on February 27, 2023, 12:33:16 PM
Looking for any and all input.

I recently purchased a 1973 CV21 to restore.  It has a newer Berkeley jet pump, but no engine.  The first two paths engine replacement could take are both in the same 300-350 hp range:
1.)  Replace it with an early 70's vintage Olds 455 big block like original.  Would at least start with a marine engine, possibly a non-runner for complete rebuild, or something more together.  I'm pretty certain I would use a Holly Sniper EFI fuel system and an HEI distributor, but otherwise pretty old school.  Would integrate into the electrical system, gauges, etc. like the original.
2.)  Replace it with a 2000's Mercruiser 6.2L engine.  Might be something needing repair, or drop in ready. Would have modern ignition, fuel injection, but no doubt present some challenges integrating it into the original dash and controls.  Might be a few $1000 more than the Olds, but worth it to have the later technology?

So when thinking about reliability, driveability, sensory, fun, resale, servicing, what would be your vote?  I know fuel economy will favor the newer engine, but Michigan summers are pretty short and I don't get to put that many hours on my boats, so that takes a backseat to the other factors.  Or am I missing some things to consider?

A third possibility would be a modern big block, like a 2000's Mercruiser or Volvo Penta 8.1L, which would be 375-400 horsepower and another few $1000 more....but would that be worth it?  Would the extra HP really result in a better boat?

Thanks for you thoughts.....option 1, 2, or 3?

Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on February 27, 2023, 12:40:54 PM
Why limit to three options?   What is the overall condition of the rest of the boat?   Just about anything can be configured to connect to that drive.    What is the long term thinking?   Period correct restoration?   Go fast have fun?   Honestly you could find a reasonable small block to drop in to make it operational for the 23 season, take what was learned and go forward in the fall.  Just some ideas
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on February 27, 2023, 02:54:30 PM
Hi Plugcheck,

To answer your questions:
1.) You're right, there are a lot of options.  I thought the three I chose:  original big block, modern small block (same HP), modern big block (more HP) covered a lot of the variants and would bring out the majority of the pro and con arguments.  On a personal level, I was a 30-yr GM engineer, so I have more experience with GM engines.
2.) As far as current condition, the original upholstery is in good condition, and I'm hoping the hazing on the gel coat will wet sand off.  Some missing pieces, the windshield frame and grab handle in particular, will be a problem.  But I'd still like to get as close to original as possible.  That said, there is no shortage of older hot rods and muscle cars being restored with modern motors.....this could be the boat version.
3.) Speed isn't my #1 priority.  This is about cruising around the local 800-acre lake with wife and dog, and having a high probability of getting back to the ramp without a tow.  Well, maybe a place diverter rooster tail would be cool.....
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: carlsoncvx18 on February 27, 2023, 03:17:09 PM
If you do not care about originality. 

I would lean towards the gm6.2 they make a lot of hp and torque their light weight.   
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on February 27, 2023, 03:55:19 PM
A mouse or ls would certainly be a cheaper build than a rat, although not as high on the cool factor.    The 6.2 is a fine powerplant, but the 5.3 shouldn't be counted out, powerfull and plentiful.    A place diverter is very high on the cool factor scale, but Im afraid Id get in trouble with one if I had it. Likely you are more responsible?.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on February 28, 2023, 08:18:14 AM
Good words about the small blocks, guys.  I had ruled out the standard output 5.7L (250hp) since I have a psychological floor at 300hp.  But now I see there were some high output 5.7L MPI ski boat engines up to 325 hp in the late 90's.  Should be minimal electronics to integrate into the instrument panel.....I need to watch some videos or read some blogs or on-line articles related to the installation.  Has anyone in this forum put a newer inboard engine into a GC?

The Olds 455 jet boat engine is largely a western US thing, the availability of a used 5.7L HO ski boat engine east of the Mississippi should be much higher.  Biggest issue will probably be finding one with some hours left in it.....ski boats have a tendency to be used pulling towlines vs. sitting on sandbars.

My biggest temptation with a place diverter would be dousing an obnoxious stereo.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on February 28, 2023, 10:23:08 AM
I suppose one aspect of your selection criteria should be cost.    Ballpark what are you looking to spend?
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on February 28, 2023, 12:35:21 PM
I'm hoping these are reasonable amounts to buy a used marine engine and get it running well:
- 455 Olds or 5.7 L       $ 6-8K
- 6.2 L                        $ 8-10K
- 8.1 L                        $10-12K
(I don't think the marine 6.0L and 5.3L have been around long enough to get a deal on a used one)

I'll spend the extra money for the 6.2 L or 8.1 L to have a better boat, but feedback thus far has generally recommended newer, smaller displacement motors, suggesting stay at the low end of the scale.  The boat came with two sets of logs & snails and a bellhousing, so the installation cost for the Olds would be almost zero, all other motors will be another $1-2K to get the gauges and controls working (?).  I like the idea of a 1/2 closed-loop cooling system to avoid the high pressure problems when the jet pump feeds directly into the engine, so another $1000 there for the heat exchanger.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on February 28, 2023, 12:56:18 PM
Exhaust costs can be considerable if you opt for non Olds, considering you have those.   I have $3k in EMI thunders for BBC for comparison.  Wondering how difficult a 455 in good shape would be to find?   The dash gauges can work a variety of engines, so if you want to keep a classic dash, then there are ways to interface.     As for water control, my friends 23, 460 jet, we simply used a gate valve and adjust water flow for desired temps.  Wire it in the position that works best.    Seems to have worked well for several years.     Closed cooling has its good/bad.   If I was in saltwater, id certainly consider it, but we travel mostly in fairly clean lakes.   Missouri river is a bit muddy, but an end of the day flush seems to take care of that .     
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on February 28, 2023, 01:07:06 PM
Found a 455 supplier out of Tyler TX that has a no core 455 offering for under $3k.   By the time you get it installed and set up probably be around $6k.   Would be a step towards period correct resto and all new.   BTW, ever consider a Billy Bob copy?
    https://www.mabbcomotors.com
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on February 28, 2023, 02:10:00 PM
Yep, the mabbcomotors pricing is what I've used to set up my financial baseline.  There's also an Olds 455 Hardin set-up with an extra short-block in Idaho, and a rebuilder in Spokane 8 hours away, that I've contacted.  Lot's of logistic issues there!  Would also end up about $6K.

I'm also watching a Mercruiser 5.7L MAG on the east coast, a 320hp MPI version of the GM small block for $5400.  It has wet exhaust risers, so don't I just run exhaust hose from there into my through-hull flappers?  I could see it run and haul it back on a Uhaul utility trailer.  It puts me right back in the old vs. new discussion at the same price point.

I'll take your cooling system input under advisement.  I'm reluctant to winterize my own boats and risk cracking a block, but would do a closed loop myself since the engine is already full of antifreeze.  That would save me about $200 per year.

My wife thinks it's cute that I keep watching the 007 chase scene over and over since I bought the CV21. That Billy Bob boat had a nasty paint job (all the land excursions) and exhaust pipes coming through the sun pad.....my daughters will want to be able to lay out!  I do like the twin swept antennas.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: ccv-19 on March 01, 2023, 12:44:58 PM
 Very few options for exhaust for the Olds motors.
 Dont need to worry about too much pressure from the pump
with the log manifolds . When you use the over the transom
open exhaust thats when there is a problem. With the logs
its mostly open flow .
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on March 08, 2023, 06:43:54 AM
New twist.
My neighbor is a great mechanic (cars, boats, planes).  He built a Chevy 454 for an early 60's Biscayne but ended up putting in a more period-correct 409.  So he may give/sell me cheap the 454.  I know I'd have to marinize the obvious things, maybe even a new cam.  Is a newer BBC a good compromise?
rbay
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on March 08, 2023, 09:19:25 PM
The cam would need to light on the duration, BBC loves to suck water at idle.    Carb, fuel pump, and alternator should be marine items due to fire/explosion hazard.   Exhaust may be pricey and stock cast are way heavy.   I have a pair of cast BBC manifolds, but no risers that I would part with.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on March 09, 2023, 03:33:15 PM
I have a parallel discussion going on performanceboats.com.  There's a guy there with a complete set of BBC logs/snails, engine mounts, bellhousing, PTO, driveshaft he would sell me for a pretty good price.  Yep, know about all the explosion-proof substitutions. Figured I'd need a new cam, maybe marine head gaskets.  I like the idea of the jet cooling water thermostats that manage the flow of water to the engine.

Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: carlsoncvx18 on March 09, 2023, 04:08:52 PM
Are you going to run in fresh water?  Standard felpro head gaskets work just fine. Had a set on my boat for 13yrs no problems. Haven?t touch it other 1 set of plugs.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: demian5 on March 09, 2023, 05:34:35 PM
I always through a supercharged 4-cyl motor out of a cobalt ss would be cool in my cvx16ss
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on March 23, 2023, 10:03:39 AM
I've had a lot of back and forth over at performanceboats.com and am now thinking to buy a used, complete pullout GM LS engine.  The best would be an LS2 - 6.0L/400hp, but an earlier and less expensive earlier LS1 - 5.7L/350hp would do great, too.  I think there would be quite a lot of intrinsic value in having "Corvette" logo motor covers in the engine compartment.  The lower end of these LS engines is rock solid (6-bolt mains), aluminum block and heads, and there are already quite a few marine application parts.  The unicorn seems to be the exhaust system.....going to spend $2K on manifolds and risers unless I can find a set of used Ford 351W logs and snails.  With some re-drilling on the cylinder flanges they fit.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: ccv-19 on March 23, 2023, 11:53:27 AM
 Ebay
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on March 23, 2023, 12:58:39 PM
That's a good deal, ccv-19.
Interesting they've sold 19.....maybe a low-production run?
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: Plugcheck on March 23, 2023, 01:41:26 PM
Might try these folks, they seem to be quite familiar with this type of conversion.   http://www.chelseacoachworks.com/pages/show_frame.php?menu=../boats/boat_bar.html&content=http%3A//www.chelseacoachworks.com/boats/pages/ls1.html
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: ccv-19 on March 23, 2023, 06:25:08 PM

 My results on a 455 Olds with log manifolds . 
They are very restrictive .
 Different heads on same motor made no top end speed difference.
 These were the port sizes on the different heads with same valve sizes.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: thedeuceman on March 23, 2023, 09:37:16 PM
I have a set of Nissan manifolds with risers they?re stainless steel. I?ve heard rumors they?re very close.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on March 24, 2023, 11:13:46 PM
The key dimension is that the ports are equally spaced, close to 4.4? center to center.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: still_fishin on March 25, 2023, 11:46:39 PM
If those are the ones i gave you they were toyota. If not,  I'll watch my own bobber.
I have a set of Nissan manifolds with risers they?re stainless steel. I?ve heard rumors they?re very close.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: still_fishin on March 25, 2023, 11:49:30 PM
One of the ls marine swap pages has a guy posting about some adapters from whatever you have to ls flange.  I'll look for it.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: still_fishin on March 25, 2023, 11:57:54 PM
Here it is.  https://m.facebook.com/groups/LSxPoweredBoats/permalink/3320169028310265/?mibextid=Nif5oz
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: thedeuceman on March 26, 2023, 06:49:49 AM
Thanks for the correction Tim, yes they are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on March 26, 2023, 12:19:44 PM
Great Facebook group tip still_fishin. I?m going to have to join its 6100 members!
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: still_fishin on March 26, 2023, 01:35:17 PM
Scroll down that lsx page to August 26 of 2022. Specifically Kyle Frasier, he is the one building the adapters.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on April 07, 2023, 12:52:51 PM
Like I tell my daughters when faced with a lot of political mumbo jumbo, show me the data!

For the original powerplant question, "old (big block) vs new (GM LS)", I plotted the horsepower "demand" curve of a Berkeley 12J jet pump against the horsepower "supply" curves of the following engines (by graph color):
ORANGE  - 1969 Olds 455, 310 HP, my CV21 missing engine
 PURPLE  - 1970 Chevy 454, 330 HP
    BLUE   - Chevy 5.7L LS1 (car intake, aluminum block), 350 HP
   GREEN - Chevy 6.0L L96 (truck intake, iron block), 365 HP
      RED  - Chevy 6.0L LS2 (car intake, aluminum block), 400 HP
   BLACK  - Chevy 6.2L L92 (truck intake, aluminum block), 400 HP

Some comments and observations.

1.)  Pardon my squiggles, but the process is to overlay the engine HP graph over the pump graph in .ppt, hand trace the engine HP curve, then delete the engine graph.
2.)  I know all these engines can be modified to make more HP, but I needed to reduce the variables and make an assessment of their starting points.
3.) There's a lot of talk out there about the low rpm torque of the Olds 455 engine.  True, and very important when torque is what's needed to turn a car axle to make it go forward. But a jet boat moves forward when the weight of water (volume x velocity) being thrown backwards creates a forward thrust.....kinetic pumps need power to keep that water moving.  So for a jet boat, the BBO has a lot of unusable torque at the lower RPM, and runs out of HP just when the pump starts needing it.  Yes, it had the lowest HP to start with, but even shifted slightly higher the curves collide. For a propeller-driven boat, it may be back to torque rules.
2.)  Of the two old-school big blocks, the Chevy creates horsepower later and longer, so probably a better inherent match for the needs of a jet pump.
3.)  I'll assume my CV21 has an A-cut aluminum impeller, so for the "A" pump curve:
       - The 5.7L LS1 makes its power too late, it will max out at a lower RPM than the Olds (the BLUE dot)
       - The 6.2L L92 will max out at the highest RPM of all the engines plotted. (the BLACK dot)
4.)  To really optimize the system, going to a cutdown "C", or even a more standard "B" cut, stainless steel impeller is indicated.  Here the L92 and the 6.0L LS2 are about tied.

So my bottom line is that, once I get a good handle on the hull and interior restoration of my CV21, I will start shopping for either:
- A 6.2L L92 engine.  It still has the 100# lighter aluminum block and horsepower of the more expensive LS2 (about avg $2K more on eBay).  For $500 you can swap on the LS3 intake and fuel rails to get the 5" lower intake height and cleaner top of engine appearance.
- A 6.0L LS2 engine, if I want to pay more to be able to show the Corvette LS2 engine covers.

The impeller swap then becomes a stand-alone decision, since either engine would benefit.

I invite comments, or if others want to show their charts using the same process for other engines.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: ccv-19 on April 13, 2023, 04:07:06 PM
 You dont need a stainless impeller with your HP.
  They dont flex like a prop does .Alum 500 dollars-1300 stainless
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: ccv-19 on April 13, 2023, 04:12:29 PM
 
 The last pict. wasnt to show impeller chart but to show how a jet is different from a
   prop tied to a dock reference.
Title: Re: ORIGINAL VS MODERN POWERPLANT
Post by: rbay on April 14, 2023, 08:07:46 AM
I've seen for an aluminum impeller:
Berkeley chart:    330hp max, 4700 rpm
Websites:    500hp max, 5000+ rpm

Expect to be in the 400-450hp range, will aluminum be OK to 5300-5500 rpm?